VELARU GALACTIC EXHIBIT PACK — AI MODEL SUPPLY CHAIN PROVENANCE Jurisdiction: Global / Multi-jurisdiction (global) Modality: Text / Chat Program: Velaru Mandate Registry — AI Model Supply Chain Provenance (galactic_model_provenance) Product ID: model_provenance:global:bundle:text Vertical: model_provenance Generated: 2026-08-11T00:23:39.490632Z Authority: Global External Validation — GPAI Model Supply Chain Pack Deadline: EU AI Act Art 53 GPAI obligations Velaru verify: https://velaru.onrender.com/verify EXHIBIT A — AI INVENTORY [] EXHIBIT B — GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK { "framework": "Velaru Mandate Registry \u2014 AI Model Supply Chain Provenance", "exhibit_authority": "Global External Validation \u2014 GPAI Model Supply Chain Pack", "regulatory_frameworks": [ "EU AI Act Article 53", "NTIA AI Accountability", "ISO 42001", "NIST AI RMF 1.0", "OECD AI Principles" ], "standards_alignment": [ "POSS-2", "DRP-1", "TCB", "FRE 707 pre-compliance", "ISO 42001" ], "human_oversight": "release model version", "third_party_verification": "https://velaru.onrender.com/verify (operator-independent)", "data_lineage": "Hash-chained Ed25519 receipts; optional RFC3161 + external anchor", "mirror_trap": "Downstream deployer fined for upstream model change \u2014 receipt chain links provider to deployer. \u00b7 Multinationals built for one jurisdiction fail exams in another \u2014 one receipt architecture, many filing packs.", "chain_integrity": { "depth": 39, "invariant_holds": true } } EXHIBIT D — DATA INPUTS & VALIDATION { "data_validation_method": "Cryptographic receipt per AI decision; public verify without trusting deployer, vendor, or Velaru operator", "bias_testing_proxy": "Asymmetry score from live chain signals", "model_change_control": "Policy lock registry \u2014 criteria hash frozen pre-dispute", "logging_retention": "90-day pre-dispute window minimum; permanent verify permalinks", "external_validator": "Nisaba LLC / Velaru", "validator_independence": "Client-side Ed25519 verify; BYOK tri-receipt optional", "headline_stat": "Systemic risk GPAI \u2014 EU requires model evaluation documentation + incident reporting", "global_leaders_addressed": [ "EU AI Office", "Hugging Face", "Meta AI", "Mistral", "NTIA", "ISO", "NIST", "OECD" ] } MIRROR TRAP (regulatory insight) Downstream deployer fined for upstream model change — receipt chain links provider to deployer. · Multinationals built for one jurisdiction fail exams in another — one receipt architecture, many filing packs. NERVE CARDS — WHY GLOBAL LEADERS CARE [ { "title": "Art 53", "body": "GPAI provider obligations \u2014 technical documentation includes decision logging architecture.", "source": "vertical" }, { "title": "NTIA AI Accountability", "body": "US parallel \u2014 dual compliance with one receipt primitive.", "source": "vertical" }, { "title": "Supply chain", "body": "Fine-tuned model inherits base model liability \u2014 chain of receipts required.", "source": "vertical" }, { "title": "[Global / Multi-jurisdiction] Jurisdiction shopping ends", "body": "Regulators share examination findings via IAIS, IOSCO, Basel \u2014 governance gap in one market triggers another.", "source": "jurisdiction" }, { "title": "[Global / Multi-jurisdiction] Vendor contract forum", "body": "AI vendor chooses Delaware law \u2014 deployer owns EU, UK, and US state fines simultaneously.", "source": "jurisdiction" }, { "title": "[Text / Chat] Modality hook", "body": "Baseline \u2014 all frameworks apply to text decisions.", "source": "modality" } ] BOOK SUMMARY: { "total_insureds": 0, "compliant": 0, "grace_period": 0, "non_compliant": 0, "expired": 0, "not_enrolled": 0, "compliant_pct": 0.0 } TAM / EXPOSURE: GPAI providers · Art 53 applies from Aug 2025 INSURANCE LINES: E&O, IP defense, Cyber DISCLAIMER: External validation evidence pack — not legal advice, not filed rate approval.