VELARU GALACTIC EXHIBIT PACK — AI TENANT SCREENING / FAIR HOUSING Jurisdiction: Global / Multi-jurisdiction (global) Modality: Text / Chat Program: Velaru Mandate Registry — AI Tenant Screening / Fair Housing (galactic_tenant_screening) Product ID: tenant_screening:global:bundle:text Vertical: tenant_screening Generated: 2026-08-11T00:22:53.058309Z Authority: Global External Validation — FCRA §615 + Fair Housing AI Screening Pack Deadline: HUD AI guidance enforcement wave Velaru verify: https://velaru.onrender.com/verify EXHIBIT A — AI INVENTORY [] EXHIBIT B — GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK { "framework": "Velaru Mandate Registry \u2014 AI Tenant Screening / Fair Housing", "exhibit_authority": "Global External Validation \u2014 FCRA \u00a7615 + Fair Housing AI Screening Pack", "regulatory_frameworks": [ "Fair Housing Act", "FCRA Section 615", "HUD AI guidance", "ADA Title III", "EU AI Act Annex III", "ISO 42001", "NIST AI RMF 1.0", "OECD AI Principles" ], "standards_alignment": [ "POSS-2", "DRP-1", "TCB", "FRE 707 pre-compliance", "ISO 42001" ], "human_oversight": "approve/deny rental application", "third_party_verification": "https://velaru.onrender.com/verify (operator-independent)", "data_lineage": "Hash-chained Ed25519 receipts; optional RFC3161 + external anchor", "mirror_trap": "Adverse action notice requires what data AI used \u2014 receipt IS the notice infrastructure. \u00b7 Multinationals built for one jurisdiction fail exams in another \u2014 one receipt architecture, many filing packs.", "chain_integrity": { "depth": 39, "invariant_holds": true } } EXHIBIT D — DATA INPUTS & VALIDATION { "data_validation_method": "Cryptographic receipt per AI decision; public verify without trusting deployer, vendor, or Velaru operator", "bias_testing_proxy": "Asymmetry score from live chain signals", "model_change_control": "Policy lock registry \u2014 criteria hash frozen pre-dispute", "logging_retention": "90-day pre-dispute window minimum; permanent verify permalinks", "external_validator": "Nisaba LLC / Velaru", "validator_independence": "Client-side Ed25519 verify; BYOK tri-receipt optional", "headline_stat": "ZIP-as-proxy = redlining pattern \u2014 AI screening in DOJ crosshairs", "global_leaders_addressed": [ "HUD", "RealPage (litigation)", "AppFolio", "Zillow", "DOJ Civil Rights", "ISO", "NIST", "OECD" ] } MIRROR TRAP (regulatory insight) Adverse action notice requires what data AI used — receipt IS the notice infrastructure. · Multinationals built for one jurisdiction fail exams in another — one receipt architecture, many filing packs. NERVE CARDS — WHY GLOBAL LEADERS CARE [ { "title": "RealPage ripple", "body": "Property mgmt AI pricing/screening consolidated \u2014 systemic fair housing exposure.", "source": "vertical" }, { "title": "FCRA 30-day clock", "body": "Adverse action without specific factors = automatic statutory damages pattern.", "source": "vertical" }, { "title": "Insurance bind", "body": "Landlord policies increasingly ask if AI screening used \u2014 silent = E&O for broker.", "source": "vertical" }, { "title": "[Global / Multi-jurisdiction] Jurisdiction shopping ends", "body": "Regulators share examination findings via IAIS, IOSCO, Basel \u2014 governance gap in one market triggers another.", "source": "jurisdiction" }, { "title": "[Global / Multi-jurisdiction] Vendor contract forum", "body": "AI vendor chooses Delaware law \u2014 deployer owns EU, UK, and US state fines simultaneously.", "source": "jurisdiction" }, { "title": "[Text / Chat] Modality hook", "body": "Baseline \u2014 all frameworks apply to text decisions.", "source": "modality" } ] BOOK SUMMARY: { "total_insureds": 0, "compliant": 0, "grace_period": 0, "non_compliant": 0, "expired": 0, "not_enrolled": 0, "compliant_pct": 0.0 } TAM / EXPOSURE: 44M US renter households · algorithmic screening litigation INSURANCE LINES: Landlord liability, Fair housing E&O DISCLAIMER: External validation evidence pack — not legal advice, not filed rate approval.