VELARU GALACTIC EXHIBIT PACK — RADIOLOGY AI (SAMD) Jurisdiction: United States (Federal) (us_federal) Modality: Text / Chat Program: Velaru Radiology AI (SaMD) · United States (Federal) (galactic_radiology_ai_us_federal) Product ID: radiology_ai:us_federal:bundle:text Vertical: radiology_ai Generated: 2026-08-11T02:37:13.725291Z Authority: US Federal Exhibit — Radiology AI (SaMD) External Validation Pack Deadline: FDA SaMD + EU MDR Velaru verify: https://velaru.onrender.com/verify EXHIBIT A — AI INVENTORY [] EXHIBIT B — GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK { "framework": "Velaru Mandate Registry \u2014 Radiology AI (SaMD)", "exhibit_authority": "US Federal Exhibit \u2014 Radiology AI (SaMD) External Validation Pack", "regulatory_frameworks": [ "HIPAA", "FDA SaMD guidance", "EU AI Act Annex III", "FTC Act \u00a75", "EEOC Title VII", "NAIC Model Bulletin", "EO 14179 AI policy" ], "standards_alignment": [ "POSS-2", "DRP-1", "TCB", "FRE 707 pre-compliance", "ISO 42001" ], "human_oversight": "execute Radiology AI (SaMD) AI decision", "third_party_verification": "https://velaru.onrender.com/verify (operator-independent)", "data_lineage": "Hash-chained Ed25519 receipts; optional RFC3161 + external anchor", "mirror_trap": "Hospital owns read \u2014 AI vendor owns cleared device label only \u00b7 Federal agencies disagree on AI approach \u2014 but examiners agree internal logs are insufficient.", "chain_integrity": { "depth": 39, "invariant_holds": true } } EXHIBIT D — DATA INPUTS & VALIDATION { "data_validation_method": "Cryptographic receipt per AI decision; public verify without trusting deployer, vendor, or Velaru operator", "bias_testing_proxy": "Asymmetry score from live chain signals", "model_change_control": "Policy lock registry \u2014 criteria hash frozen pre-dispute", "logging_retention": "90-day pre-dispute window minimum; permanent verify permalinks", "external_validator": "Nisaba LLC / Velaru", "validator_independence": "Client-side Ed25519 verify; BYOK tri-receipt optional", "headline_stat": "Radiology AI 510(k) \u2014 per-read decision receipt for malpractice", "global_leaders_addressed": [ "Aidoc", "Google Health", "FDA", "NAIC", "FTC", "EEOC", "CFPB", "NIST" ] } MIRROR TRAP (regulatory insight) Hospital owns read — AI vendor owns cleared device label only · Federal agencies disagree on AI approach — but examiners agree internal logs are insufficient. NERVE CARDS — WHY GLOBAL LEADERS CARE [ { "title": "Missed finding", "body": "AI flagged then dismissed \u2014 who owns miss? Receipt settles.", "source": "vertical" }, { "title": "FDA PCCP", "body": "Model update without receipt = off-label use inference", "source": "vertical" }, { "title": "[United States (Federal)] Agency pincer", "body": "FTC, CFPB, EEOC, and DOJ all active on AI \u2014 one receipt chain satisfies cross-agency discovery.", "source": "jurisdiction" }, { "title": "[United States (Federal)] Federal preemption fight", "body": "State laws filling void \u2014 multistate operators need jurisdiction-tagged receipts.", "source": "jurisdiction" }, { "title": "[Text / Chat] Modality hook", "body": "Baseline \u2014 all frameworks apply to text decisions.", "source": "modality" } ] BOOK SUMMARY: { "total_insureds": 0, "compliant": 0, "grace_period": 0, "non_compliant": 0, "expired": 0, "not_enrolled": 0, "compliant_pct": 0.0 } TAM / EXPOSURE: $2B AI radiology INSURANCE LINES: E&O, Cyber, Sector liability DISCLAIMER: External validation evidence pack — not legal advice, not filed rate approval.