LIVE RELAY|UTC —
SYNC

Nisaba LLC · Patent #64/124,027 · FRE 707 Pre-Compliant

The audit layer AI liability can't ship without

Every AI decision gets a court-grade receipt. Every silence gets cryptographic proof. Anyone can verify — without trusting the operator or Velaru.

Live product · persistent signed storage · public verifier · 49 compliance verticals · not a slide deck.

Loading live relay metrics…

Seeking · Seed round · Q4 2026 cohort

Live product on persistent storage — not a prototype. Raising to land 3 design partners, multi-tenant API, and first paid pilots in hiring AI + carrier underwriting.

Raise target$500k – $1M
Design partner slots2 of 3 open
Integrate timeSame dayOpenAI middleware · webhooks · sandbox keys
60-second close (pick one on the call)

Investor: “If verify independence holds up for you, are you open to a $25–50k SAFE conversation this week?”

Operator: “We’re taking 3 design partners — 90 days free, 10k decisions/mo. Can you be one? /partners

Intro: “Who owns AI liability or underwriting data on your side — can you intro them before Friday?”

▶ Run 4-step live demo Verify a receipt Diligence profile

📞 5-minute call script (buyer / investor)

Minute 0–1 — Hook

"We prove what your AI decided — and what it refused to answer. Independently verifiable. Paste the receipt, green checks, we never see it."

Minute 1–3 — Demo

Open /demo → Step 1–4 (Hiring + Safe). Send message → show signed receipt → Lock Policy → explain pre-commitment.

Minute 3–4 — Verify

Copy Receipt JSON → /verify✓ RECEIPT VERIFIED. "Velaru can't alter this result — it runs in your browser."

Minute 4–5 — Close

Pick one: (1) SAFE $25–50k if investor, (2) design partner slot at /partners, (3) intro to carrier/GC/HR owner. Don't leave without a dated next step.

If they ask "is this production?" → "Production infra with persistent storage and ops tooling; enterprise hardening is the raise."

Why this wins

The gap

Platforms prove what they generated. Nobody proves refusals, silence, or retroactive rule changes — until dispute discovery.

Velaru primitive

Hash-chained Ed25519 receipts + completeness invariant + public /verify + GitHub gist anchor. Operator can't forge alone with BYOK co-sign.

Why now

EU AI Act logging, AI liability insurance (Mayflower/Hadron 2026), hiring AI scrutiny — buyers need audit artifacts, not guardrail demos.

Moat

Verify independence + proof-of-silence + policy lock registry. Classifier is table stakes; the tamper-evident audit chain is the product.

What's live today

Use of capital (seed / pilot)

NowFirst design partners — apply at /partners · AmTrust-style EPL, carrier underwriting, HR AI vendors
Q4Postgres + multi-tenant API · SOC 2 path · auto-anchor every receipt
Q4Measured benchmark suite published · sales engineer hire
Series AEnterprise HA · HSM BYOK · vertical compliance packs as SKU

FAQ (investors)

Is the classifier the product?
No. The audit chain, verify independence, and proof-of-silence are the product. Classification is necessary infrastructure.
Can Velaru forge receipts?
Not without the customer's key in BYOK mode. Public /verify runs client-side — we can't alter green checks.
What's the business model?
Per-decision audit API, enterprise compliance tier, insurer/carrier data feeds for AI liability pricing.
Competition?
Guardrails log chat. Velaru produces court-grade artifacts with external anchors — different buyer (GC, carrier, regulator).
"Show me the receipt." — Every AI liability conversation in 2026 ends here. Velaru is the receipt.
Design partner program → Start live demo → All links